How many pro-abortionists support the idea of infanticide?
…because there’s a difference between a fetus and an infant? And once it is born it is a separate thing completely from its mother…it is no longer dependent on her body. Pesonally, I wouldn’t have an abortion after the first 12 weeks. Believe it or not, not everyone who is prochoice is cool with murdering infants…I know this must be shocking to you since you live in a realm outside of reality.Since an infant is nothing more than a mere leech of off their parents for at least the first three months, sucking down all of their resources, what is wrong with killing it outside of the womb? An infant doesn’t even become self-aware until much later!
Well, that is not the implication I was trying to make. I’m saying gender/race/class/sexuality certainly DO affect the way we see and interact with the world. I wasn’t trying to say these are the ONLY ways for determining “identity”..I’m saying these things in addition to the ones you mentioned (personality, beliefs, likes/dislikes etc etc) all make up what you are and who you are. I guess I was saying I don’t make a distinction between what and who you are..that they are mutually informed by one another. And finally, I was just trying to call CK out on her near constant and unfounded slandering of “all” liberals, because most of what she says is total bullshit. I don’t see how examining gender race and sexuality constitutes as thinking they’re the “only” factors that matter..it’s quite the opposite.this is too stupid not to comment on. What DOES define who you are then, if…Liberals think you’re nothing but your gender, your sexuality, and your race, and they will use this to their political advantage.
Seriously, what you are does not define who you are.
Conservatives think you’re more than your gender, your sexuality, and your race.
this is too stupid not to comment on. What DOES define who you are then, if it’s not what you are? Seriously..is there some extra part that defines who you are? Am I missing something? or is this some shitty attempt to sound ~profound~ ? Also liberals don’t think that at all. All you do is generalize constantly.Liberals think you’re nothing but your gender, your sexuality, and your race, and they will use this to their political advantage.
Seriously, what you are does not define who you are.
Well, that’s rather interesting. Apparently someone is talking to another person pretending to be me. That scares me to be honest; my name is my reputation and I’m not a fan of people trying hijack it.
C’est la vie!
I saw this and thought the same thing…
Maybe someone has the same name as you?
I actually think it’s the owner of the blog trying to seem reputable.
ugh, CK chill. Why would I send myself a message calling myself immature and then sign it with the name of a blog I’ve never seen until just now to seem “reputable?” Secondly the anon’s message was continued in the next message I received (i believe) so the last part actually reads “Andrewfriedle described the first post well, so my part here is done. :) Thank you for your time.”
Sorry to bother you again. I would appreciate it if you could remove the Andrewfriedle from the question you answered. I didn't mention it in my previous question because it didn't occur for me to ask. I hope that isn't too much trouble and sorry that you're caught in the middle of all this.
hmm I actually think the message ending with your name was continued in another message which simply reads “described the first post well, so my part here is done. :) Thank you for your time.” Its the only way the second message makes sense, anyway. I’ve never seen your blog until just now.
Please understand that I'm anonymous because I don't have a Tumblr, and not because I'm being a coward. I have a few things that I'd like to say. The first part about the obsession is the fact that you actually created a blog solely to "argue" her. If someone did that to you on your private blog, admit it. You'd think that they were obsessing or stalking you. It's a little immature. I also hope that you understand hyperboles. The "I hope you die" is a hyperbole of what they say. Andrewfriedle
AnonymousIt’s not an “obsession.” I read her blog. That’s what blogs are for, to be read. Secondly, this blog wasn’t “created” for anything. It is untitled. It has 3 reblogs on it. The blog was simply an add on to my personal blog. I did this for multiple reasons. 1) I wanted to be anonymous and CK doesn’t allow anon questions. 2) My real blog(s) are not political in any way, they mostly feature my art, poetry and fiction writing. I did not want to clutter them up with political arguments and 3) I did not want her supporters coming on to my blogs and asking me questions (as so many of you have already, thus proving my point). If I created this blog just to tell CK how awesome she was, then this would be a non-issue. But since I didn’t, it’s all everyone wants to talk about. And yeah, I do understand hyperbole, but I don’t know what you are referring to here or if I have discussed this on CK’s blog before or what. In any case hyperbole isn’t a great way to state and/or defend an argument, which is pretty standard for CK since she can’t argue for shit.
I just wanted to let you know to keep up the good work. Communism Kills needs to go down. She's a madwoman, a hybrid of the Michelle Bachmanns and Herman Cains of our world. I've also noticed that she will ignore ANY question she sees that demeans or reprimands or corrects her, ensuring that only questions that she can avoid or provide a "smart-alack" answer to is answered. She doesn't get foreign policy in the slightest, and I'd just like to commend you on your assaults on her. Please continue.
I agree completely. Though it is impossible to argue with her seriously, I cannot help myself sometimes as her beliefs are simultaneously unbelievable and infuriating.
So, why DID you set up this account? It's obvious you have a private account. Why call HER butthurt if you can't take it on your own blog?
uh, when did I ever call her butthurt? I didn’t. I like to argue with her outrageous beliefs because I disagree with them. I don’t want her or her fans’ garbage on my personal blog or ask box, so I took the 3 seconds it takes to make an additional anonymous blog. It’s unfortunate that she chooses to bring this up constantly because she cannot rationally argue her points without stooping to personal attacks.
